CSI Product-Oriented Endorsement & Readiness Framework

A Comprehensive Methodology for Certifying Market-Ready Converged Security Solutions

Issued by: Converged Security Institute (CSI)

Version: 1.0

Date: September 2025

Location: Martorell, Catalonia, Spain

Credentialing Authority: CSI Advisory Panel – C-CSP Chartered Members

Executive Summary

The CSI Product-Oriented Endorsement & Readiness Framework provides a comprehensive methodology for certifying market-ready converged security solutions. This framework validates technical interoperability, regulatory compliance, and deployment maturity while promoting vendor-neutral standards aligned with EN, ISO, and EU directives.

Framework Objectives

Framework Enhancements (2025)

To strengthen accessibility and global relevance while maintaining certification rigor, the framework incorporates:


1. Product Capability Domains & Evaluation Criteria

The framework evaluates products across 22 comprehensive domains, each focusing on specific capability areas:

Domain Product Capability Focus
Strategic GovernanceRisk dashboards, compliance mapping, executive reporting
Technical ArchitectureModular design, open APIs, Zero Trust/SASE compatibility
Operational CapabilityIncident response automation, SOC integration, business continuity modules
Credentialing & AssuranceAudit logs, maturity scoring, documentation transparency
Zero Trust ArchitecturePolicy enforcement, segmentation engines, continuous validation
Identity & Access ManagementRole-based access, MFA, IAM integration
Strategy & Risk ManagementThreat modelling tools, risk scoring engines
Leadership & GovernanceBoard-level analytics, strategic alignment modules
IT Platforms & InfrastructureCloud/hybrid deployment, endpoint protection, scalability
Physical SecurityCCTV, access control, PSIM integration
Vendor ManagementSLA tracking, vendor risk scoring, lifecycle management
Legal & ComplianceGDPR/NIS2/DORA compliance modules, ISO certification mapping
Human ResourcesInsider risk detection, onboarding/offboarding automation
Education & TrainingLMS integration, awareness modules, certification tracking
Operations & ResilienceBCP automation, failover orchestration, recovery analytics
Audit & AssuranceControls testing, reporting engines, compliance dashboards
Systems IntegrationSIEM, PSIM, IAM orchestration, API connectors
Cross-Functional CollaborationShared dashboards, workflow engines, IT/OT/security alignment
Intelligence (OSINT/HUMINT)Threat feeds, source validation, situational awareness engines
CybersecurityIDS/IPS, threat hunting, vulnerability management
Digital ResilienceBackup orchestration, resilience scoring, continuity planning
Insider RiskUEBA, behavioural analytics, access misuse detection

1.1 Pre-Certification Core Domains

For the Pre-Certification Track, assessment focuses on 10 core domains:

Core Domain Rationale for Pre-Certification Inclusion
Strategic GovernanceEssential for enterprise readiness and stakeholder buy-in
Technical ArchitectureFoundation for scalability and integration capabilities
Operational CapabilityCritical for day-to-day security operations effectiveness
Systems IntegrationCore requirement for converged security solutions
CybersecurityFundamental security protection capabilities
Identity & Access ManagementEssential access control and authentication functions
Legal & ComplianceBasic regulatory alignment and compliance readiness
IT Platforms & InfrastructureInfrastructure deployment and compatibility requirements
Physical SecurityPhysical-cyber convergence demonstration
Zero Trust ArchitectureModern security architecture alignment

2. Product Evaluation Dimensions

Each product is assessed across five critical dimensions:

Dimension Description
InteroperabilitySeamless integration with SIEM, PSIM, IAM, and other platforms
Compliance ReadinessAlignment with EN standards, ISO frameworks, and EU directives
Deployment MaturityProven field performance, scalability, and modularity
User ExperienceIntuitive interfaces, role-based access, multilingual support
Innovation & IntelligenceUse of AI/ML, threat intelligence, automation, and predictive analytics

3. Technical Assessment Toolkits

3.1 Systems Integration Mapping Toolkit

Purpose: Evaluate product capabilities in integrating core security systems

Use Case: Vendor submission, evaluator scoring, and technical validation

3.1.1 Integration Categories

Integration Type Description
SIEMSecurity Information & Event Management – centralized log analysis and threat detection
PSIMPhysical Security Information Management – unified control of physical systems
IAMIdentity & Access Management – authentication, authorization, and role-based access
API ConnectorsRESTful or streaming APIs for interoperability with third-party platforms

3.1.2 Standards & Guidance

Reference Applies To Vendor Evidence Required
Oracle SIEM Integration GuideSIEM orchestration in cloud environmentsLog ingestion, alert correlation, ML-based threat detection
CISA SIEM & SOAR ImplementationSIEM/SOAR deployment best practicesPriority log sources, automated response workflows
Microsoft Defender SIEM API IntegrationStreaming APIs and incident ingestionOAuth2 authentication, schema mapping, CIM compatibility

3.1.3 Vendor Mapping Template

Integration Type Score (0–5) Evidence / Notes
SIEMSupported platforms (Splunk, ArcSight, Sentinel, etc.)
PSIMPhysical system connectors (CCTV, access control, alarms)
IAMRole-based access, MFA, SSO, identity federation
API ConnectorsRESTful endpoints, streaming APIs, SDKs, documentation
Subtotal Score:____ / 20

3.1.4 Evaluator Rubric – Systems Integration

Scoring Weights Within Interoperability Dimension:

Criteria Score Range Weight (%) Evaluator Guidance
SIEM Compatibility1–535%Ability to ingest logs, correlate events, and support threat detection workflows
PSIM Interoperability1–525%Integration with physical security systems and control center platforms
IAM Orchestration1–525%Support for identity lifecycle, access provisioning, and federated authentication
API Architecture1–515%Quality of API documentation, openness, scalability, and third-party integration

Note: These weightings reflect the critical importance of SIEM integration in converged security environments, while recognizing the foundational role of PSIM and IAM capabilities.

3.1.5 Technical Validation Checklist

Item Status (✓/✗)
SIEM integration tested with at least 2 platforms
PSIM connectors validated in live deployment
IAM orchestration supports RBAC and SSO
API documentation available and versioned
Streaming or event-based API supported

3.2 Compliance Mapping Toolkit

Purpose: Help vendors align their products with CSI's Compliance Readiness dimension

Use Case: Pre-certification self-assessment, evaluator scoring, and audit preparation

3.2.1 EN Standards Mapping

Standard Applies To Vendor Evidence Required
EN 50131Intrusion detection systemsSystem architecture, sensor integration
EN 50518Alarm receiving/control centersFacility design, redundancy, failover protocols
EN 62676Video surveillance systemsCamera specs, VMS interoperability
EN 60839-11-1Electronic access controlCredentialing logic, door controller integration
EN 50133Access control systemsAccess policies, physical security integration

3.2.2 ISO Framework Mapping

Standard Applies To Vendor Evidence Required
ISO/IEC 27001:2022Information security governanceISMS documentation, risk treatment plans
ISO 31000Enterprise risk managementRisk registers, scoring models
ISO 22301Business continuityBCP documentation, recovery workflows

3.2.3 EU Directive Mapping

Directive Applies To Vendor Evidence Required
NIS2 DirectiveCybersecurity for essential entitiesNetwork defense, incident response, reporting protocols
Cyber Resilience ActLifecycle security of digital productsSecure-by-design architecture, patching policies
GDPRData protection and privacyData flow diagrams, consent management, DPO contact
DORAICT risk in financial servicesResilience metrics, third-party risk controls

3.2.4 Global Standards Integration

To enhance international accessibility, CSI compliance mapping now includes:

Framework Region Vendor Evidence Required
NIST 800-53North AmericaControl implementation matrix, security control documentation
CIS Controls v8GlobalImplementation guide alignment, control mapping evidence
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0North AmericaFunction and category mapping, implementation tiers
ISO 27001:2022 (Global)InternationalISMS certification, risk assessment documentation
COBIT 2019GlobalGovernance and management practices alignment
Localization Guidance:

3.2.5 Evaluator Rubric: Compliance Readiness

Scoring Weights Within Compliance Readiness Dimension:

Criteria Score Range Weight (%) Evaluator Guidance
EN Standards Alignment1–530%Product meets technical and operational requirements of relevant EN standards
ISO Framework Integration1–525%Product supports ISO-aligned governance, risk, and continuity models
EU Directive Compliance1–525%Product demonstrates readiness for GDPR, NIS2, DORA, and CRA obligations
Global Standards Mapping1–515%Alignment with NIST, CIS Controls, and international frameworks
Documentation Quality1–55%Clarity, completeness, and traceability of compliance evidence

3.3 Deployment Maturity Mapping Toolkit

Purpose: Evaluate product performance, scalability, and modularity in live environments

Use Case: Vendor self-assessment, evaluator scoring, and CSI credentialing review

3.3.1 Deployment Maturity Categories

Category Description
Field PerformanceEvidence of operational success in live deployments across sectors
ScalabilityAbility to scale across users, sites, geographies, and workloads
ModularityComponent-based architecture enabling flexible deployment and integration

3.3.2 Standards & Guidance

Reference Applies To Vendor Evidence Required
Azure Security Maturity ModelSecure deployment lifecycle, threat modeling, system hardeningSDLC integration, threat modeling, monitoring, encryption strategies
AWS OT/IT Convergence Maturity ModelIndustrial-grade scalability and convergence readinessMulti-site deployment, OT/IT integration, resilience metrics
Security Convergence Maturity Model – Leiden UniversityConceptual maturity levels for convergence (CMMI-based)Governance, process, technology, and people maturity scoring

3.3.3 Vendor Mapping Template

Deployment Attribute Score (0–5) Evidence / Notes
Field PerformanceClient references, uptime metrics, incident logs
ScalabilityMulti-tenant support, cloud elasticity, regional expansion
ModularityMicroservices, plug-in architecture, containerization
Subtotal Score:____ / 15

3.3.4 Evaluator Rubric – Deployment Maturity

Scoring Weights Within Deployment Maturity Dimension:

Criteria Score Range Weight (%) Evaluator Guidance
Proven Field Performance1–550%Product has demonstrated stability, reliability, and resilience in real-world use
Scalability1–530%Product scales across users, geographies, and workloads without degradation
Modularity1–520%Product supports flexible deployment, integration, and component upgrades

3.3.5 Technical Validation Checklist

Item Status (✓/✗)
Product deployed in at least 3 live environments
Uptime SLA ≥99.9% documented
Supports horizontal and vertical scaling
Modular architecture documented (e.g., microservices)
Supports containerization or virtualized deployment

3.4 User Experience (UX) Mapping Toolkit

Purpose: Assess product usability, accessibility, and interface intelligence

Use Case: Vendor self-assessment, evaluator scoring, and CSI credentialing review

3.4.1 UX Capability Categories

Category Description
Intuitive InterfacesClean, responsive UI/UX design that supports fast navigation and task execution
Role-Based AccessInterface adapts to user roles (admin, analyst, operator, etc.) with permissions
Multilingual SupportLanguage localization and internationalization for global deployments

3.4.2 Standards & Guidance

Reference Applies To Vendor Evidence Required
Cisco Converged UX PrinciplesUnified experience across networking and security domainsUI screenshots, workflow demos, user feedback logs
Avigilon UX Best PracticesPhysical/cybersecurity convergence interface designRole-based dashboards, multilingual UI samples
CSI Publications on IAM & UXStrategic standards for IAM and interface usabilityAccess control logic, UI/UX design documentation

3.4.3 Vendor Mapping Template

UX Attribute Score (0–5) Evidence / Notes
Intuitive InterfacesUI screenshots, usability testing results, user feedback
Role-Based AccessRBAC configuration, permission matrix, adaptive UI
Multilingual SupportSupported languages, localization strategy, fallback logic
Subtotal Score:____ / 15

3.4.4 Evaluator Rubric – User Experience

Scoring Weights Within User Experience Dimension:

Criteria Score Range Weight (%) Evaluator Guidance
Interface Usability1–550%Assess clarity, responsiveness, and ease of navigation
Role-Based Personalization1–530%Evaluate how well the UI adapts to different user roles and permissions
Language Accessibility1–520%Review localization quality, language switching, and fallback behavior

3.4.5 Technical Validation Checklist

Item Status (✓/✗)
UI tested with at least 3 user roles
Role-based dashboards implemented
Multilingual UI available in ≥3 languages
Localization files versioned and documented
UX feedback collected from live deployments

3.5 Innovation & Intelligence Mapping Toolkit

Purpose: Evaluate product sophistication in automation, analytics, and threat intelligence

Use Case: Vendor self-assessment, evaluator scoring, and CSI credentialing review

3.5.1 Innovation & Intelligence Categories

Category Description
Artificial IntelligenceUse of AI/ML for anomaly detection, behavioral analysis, and decision support
Threat IntelligenceIntegration of OSINT/HUMINT feeds, real-time alerts, and situational awareness
Automation & OrchestrationAutomated workflows, playbooks, and response mechanisms
Predictive AnalyticsForecasting threats, risk scoring, and proactive mitigation

3.5.2 Standards & Guidance

Reference Applies To Vendor Evidence Required
CSI Publications on Strategic IntelligenceThreat modeling, OSINT/HUMINT integrationIntelligence feeds, alert logic, situational dashboards
CISA Security Convergence Best PracticesUnified threat response and automationPlaybook samples, orchestration engines, AI-driven response
ASIS International Convergence ReportPredictive analytics and convergence maturityRisk forecasting models, ML training datasets

3.5.3 Vendor Mapping Template

Innovation Attribute Score (0–5) Evidence / Notes
Artificial IntelligenceML models, anomaly detection, behavioral analytics
Threat IntelligenceOSINT/HUMINT feeds, alerting logic, source validation
Automation & OrchestrationResponse playbooks, workflow engines, SOAR integration
Predictive AnalyticsRisk scoring, forecasting dashboards, simulation tools
Subtotal Score:____ / 20

3.5.4 Evaluator Rubric – Innovation & Intelligence

Scoring Weights Within Innovation & Intelligence Dimension:

Criteria Score Range Weight (%) Evaluator Guidance
AI/ML Integration1–530%Evaluate depth of machine learning, training data, and decision support capabilities
Threat Intelligence Capability1–525%Assess quality, timeliness, and relevance of threat feeds and situational awareness
Automation Maturity1–525%Review orchestration logic, playbook flexibility, and response automation
Predictive Accuracy1–520%Score effectiveness of forecasting models and proactive mitigation strategies

3.5.5 Technical Validation Checklist

Item Status (✓/✗)
ML models trained on ≥6 months of threat data
OSINT/HUMINT feeds integrated and validated
Automated playbooks deployed in live PoC
Predictive dashboards used in client environments
Intelligence sources documented and versioned

3.6 Legacy & Future Compatibility Mapping Toolkit

Purpose: Evaluate product adaptability across legacy environments and future technology landscapes

Use Case: Vendor self-assessment, evaluator scoring, and CSI credentialing review

3.6.1 Compatibility Categories

Category Description
Legacy System IntegrationAbility to interface with outdated or end-of-life systems still in operation
Backward CompatibilitySupport for older protocols, data formats, and infrastructure dependencies
Future ReadinessModular architecture, cloud-native design, and support for emerging standards
Upgrade Path FlexibilityEase of versioning, patching, and transitioning to next-gen platforms

3.6.2 Standards & Guidance

Reference Applies To Vendor Evidence Required
2025 Cybersecurity Agenda – ForbesLegacy modernization and operational resilienceLegacy system support, upgrade strategy, patching roadmap
ISC2 Legacy System Security ConsiderationsRisk mitigation in legacy environmentsDependency mapping, compatibility testing, modernization plan
CSI Publications on Convergence ArchitectureFuture-proofing converged platformsModular design, cloud readiness, API extensibility

3.6.3 Vendor Mapping Template

Compatibility Attribute Score (0–5) Evidence / Notes
Legacy System IntegrationSupported legacy protocols, OT/IT bridging, middleware
Backward CompatibilityData format support, protocol emulation, legacy connectors
Future ReadinessCloud-native architecture, support for AI/ML, Zero Trust
Upgrade Path FlexibilityVersion control, patching tools, migration documentation
Subtotal Score:____ / 20

3.6.4 Evaluator Rubric – Legacy & Future Compatibility

Criteria Score Range Evaluator Guidance
Legacy Integration Capability1–5Assess ability to connect with outdated systems and maintain operational continuity
Backward Compatibility1–5Evaluate support for older protocols, data formats, and infrastructure dependencies
Future-Proof Architecture1–5Review modularity, cloud-readiness, and alignment with emerging standards
Upgrade Path & Lifecycle Support1–5Score ease of updates, versioning, and transition planning

3.6.5 Technical Validation Checklist

Item Status (✓/✗)
Product deployed in legacy environments
Supports ≥2 legacy protocols or formats
Modular architecture documented
Cloud-native or hybrid deployment supported
Upgrade roadmap available and versioned

4. Certification Pathways, Scoring & Value Framework

4.1 Tiered Certification Pathway

The framework offers a tiered pathway to accommodate vendors at different stages of maturity. This includes a Pre-Certification track for emerging solutions and a Standard Certification for market-ready products.

4.2 Product Scoring Matrix

Dimension Maximum Score
Interoperability20
Compliance Readiness20
Deployment Maturity20
User Experience20
Innovation & Intelligence20
Total Possible Score100

4.3 Certification Levels

Score Range Certification Level
90–100CSI Endorsed – Platinum Product
80–89CSI Endorsed – Gold Product
70–79CSI Endorsed – Standard Product
Below 70Not Certified – Reassessment Required

4.4 Post-Certification Support & Communication Tools

To maximize the value of CSI certification and support ongoing vendor success, the framework provides comprehensive post-certification resources and communication support.

4.4.1 Continuous Improvement Resources

Quarterly Maturity Workshops

Monthly Webinar Series: "Beyond Certification"

Annual Certification Resource Packs

4.4.2 Communication & Marketing Support

Ready-to-Use Communication Templates

CSI provides certified vendors with professionally crafted communication materials to effectively articulate certification value:

Press Release Templates

Standard Certification Announcement Example:

"[Vendor Name] Achieves CSI Product Endorsement, Demonstrating Excellence in Converged Security Solutions"

MARTORELL, Spain – [Date] – [Vendor Name], a leading provider of [specific solution area], today announced it has achieved Converged Security Institute (CSI) Product-Oriented Endorsement, demonstrating validated excellence across technical interoperability, regulatory compliance, and deployment maturity.

The CSI endorsement validates [Vendor Name]'s [specific product] against 22 comprehensive capability domains and five critical evaluation dimensions, including seamless SIEM/PSIM/IAM integration, EN standards alignment, and proven field performance across multiple enterprise deployments.

"Achieving CSI endorsement represents our commitment to delivering converged security solutions that meet the highest industry standards," said [Executive Name, Title]. "This independent validation provides our customers confidence in our technical capabilities and regulatory readiness."

Key validated capabilities include:

  • Advanced SIEM integration with [specific platforms]
  • GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance readiness
  • Zero Trust architecture alignment
  • Multi-language support across [number] languages
  • AI/ML-driven threat intelligence and automation

Pre-Certified to Standard Certification Upgrade Example:

"[Vendor Name] Advances to Full CSI Standard Certification, Expanding Validated Capability Portfolio"

Following successful completion of extended pilot deployments and comprehensive assessment across all 22 capability domains, [Vendor Name] has progressed from CSI Pre-Certification to Standard Certification status...

Digital Marketing Assets

LinkedIn Announcement Template:

🚀 Proud to announce [Vendor Name] has achieved CSI Product-Oriented Endorsement! This independent validation demonstrates our commitment to converged security excellence across:

  • ✅ Technical Interoperability - Seamless SIEM/PSIM/IAM integration
  • ✅ Regulatory Compliance - EN standards & EU directive alignment
  • ✅ Deployment Maturity - Proven field performance
  • ✅ User Experience - Intuitive, multilingual interfaces
  • ✅ Innovation & Intelligence - AI/ML-driven automation

Thank you to @ConvergedSecurityInstitute for their rigorous evaluation process. This certification enables our customers to procure with confidence and accelerate their security convergence initiatives.

#CSIEndorsement #ConvergedSecurity #SecurityCertification #ZeroTrust #CyberPhysicalSecurity

Email Signature Enhancement:

[Name, Title]
[Company] - CSI Certified Product Portfolio 🛡️
📧 [email] | 📞 [phone] | 🌐 [website]
Converged Security Institute Endorsed Solutions

Sales & Proposal Support Materials

Value Proposition Slide Example: "Why [Product Name] with CSI Endorsement Delivers Superior ROI"

  • Reduced Procurement Risk: Independent validation eliminates vendor evaluation uncertainties
  • Accelerated Implementation: Pre-certified interoperability reduces deployment time by 40-60%
  • Compliance Assurance: Pre-mapped regulatory frameworks ensure audit readiness
  • Future-Proof Investment: Continuous improvement framework maintains certification relevance

Competitive Differentiation Messaging: "Unlike non-certified alternatives, [Product Name] has undergone rigorous third-party validation across:"

  • 22 Technical Domains: Comprehensive capability assessment
  • 5 Critical Dimensions: Interoperability, compliance, maturity, UX, and innovation
  • Live Deployment Testing: Proven performance in real-world environments
  • Continuous Monitoring: Annual recertification ensures ongoing excellence

4.4.3 Vendor Success Program

Dedicated Account Management

Peer Learning Networks

4.4.4 Certification Maintenance & Governance

Annual Recertification Process

Certification Maintenance Guidelines

Vendor Community Governance

Incident Response & Support

4.5 Certification ROI & Business Value Framework

To strengthen the business case for CSI certification and demonstrate measurable value to senior decision-makers, the framework provides comprehensive ROI guidance and outcome measurement tools.

4.5.1 Measurable Business Outcomes

Procurement Cycle Acceleration
  • Baseline Measurement: Average vendor evaluation time for converged security solutions (typically 6-12 months)
  • CSI-Certified Advantage: Pre-validated technical capabilities reduce due diligence by 40-60%
  • Quantifiable Impact:
    • Reduced RFP response time: 30-50% faster proposal cycles
    • Shortened technical evaluation: Pre-certification eliminates 3-6 weeks of PoC testing
    • Faster contract negotiation: Standardized compliance documentation accelerates legal review
Enhanced Compliance Audit Performance
  • Compliance Score Improvements: CSI-certified solutions demonstrate 25-40% higher audit scores
  • Regulatory Alignment: Pre-mapped EN standards and EU directives reduce compliance gaps
  • Audit Preparation Time: 50-70% reduction in auditor preparation and documentation gathering
Customer Trust & Market Confidence
  • Independent Validation: Third-party CSI endorsement provides neutral credibility
  • Risk Mitigation: Certified solutions reduce buyer's risk of vendor selection errors
  • Market Differentiation: CSI Trustmark creates competitive advantage in procurement decisions

4.5.2 ROI Calculation Framework

Cost Benefit Analysis Template

CSI provides certified vendors with comprehensive ROI calculation tools:

Direct Cost Savings for Buyers
Risk Mitigation Value
Revenue Growth Opportunities for Vendors

4.5.3 Industry-Specific ROI Calculations

Financial Services Sector: DORA Compliance & Operational Resilience

Critical Infrastructure Sector: NIS2 Directive & Cyber-Physical Convergence

Manufacturing Sector: Industry 4.0 & Smart Factory Security

Healthcare Sector: Patient Data Protection & Medical Device Security

4.5.4 Business Case Development Tools

4.5.5 Success Metrics & KPI Framework

Vendor Performance Indicators

Market Impact Measurements

Customer Value Realization Tracking

Advanced Analytics & Reporting

4.5.6 ROI Validation & Measurement

These comprehensive frameworks provide concrete, measurable justification for CSI certification investment, enabling both vendors and buyers to quantify the business value of participating in the CSI endorsement ecosystem with industry-specific precision and multi-year financial modeling.


5. Credentialing & Verification Process

5.1 Process Overview

The CSI credentialing process consists of the following stages:

  1. Application Submission
    • Product profile and technical documentation
    • Compliance mapping and evidence submission
    • Initial self-assessment completion
  2. CSI Credentialing Panel Review
    • Evaluation by C-CSP chartered members
    • Technical documentation assessment
    • Preliminary scoring and feedback
  3. Proof of Concept Deployment
    • Minimum 3-month pilot in live operational environment
    • Performance metrics collection
    • Stakeholder feedback gathering
  4. Final Assessment & Certification
    • Comprehensive scoring across all dimensions
    • Technical documentation review
    • Stakeholder feedback analysis
    • Final certification decision

5.2 Required Documentation


6. Fee Structure & Recognition

6.1 Certification Fees

Product Tier Evaluation Fee Award Fee CSI Gold Member Benefit
Platinum Product€1,500€7,500Free evaluation and €5,000 award fee
Gold Product€1,500€4,500Free evaluation and €4,500 award fee
Standard Product€1,500€1,500Free evaluation and free award

6.2 Certification Benefits

Upon successful certification, vendors receive:

6.3 Renewal & Maintenance


7. Continuous Improvement Framework

7.1 Ongoing Enhancement

The CSI framework incorporates continuous improvement mechanisms:

7.2 Industry Collaboration

CSI maintains active partnerships with:


Annex I: CSI Product Endorsement Policy

1. Purpose

To establish a formal, transparent, and technically rigorous process for endorsing converged security solutions that meet CSI's standards for integration, compliance, and operational excellence.

2. Scope

This policy applies to commercial products—hardware, software, platforms, or integrated systems—that unify physical, cyber, and operational security functions. It excludes organizational maturity assessments and focuses solely on product capabilities.

3. Eligibility Requirements

Products must demonstrate:

4. Evaluation Process

The evaluation process consists of:

  1. Application Submission: Vendor provides comprehensive product profile, technical documentation, and compliance mapping
  2. Credentialing Review: Conducted by CSI Advisory Panel members holding C-CSP chartered status
  3. Proof of Concept Testing: Mandatory 3-month pilot deployment in live operational environment
  4. Scoring Assessment: Evaluation across five dimensions using standardized scoring matrix
  5. Stakeholder Validation: Collection of feedback from pilot users and CSI technical reviewers

5. Certification Levels

Certification Level Score Range Requirements
Platinum Product90–100 pointsExceptional performance across all dimensions
Gold Product80–89 pointsStrong performance with minor improvement areas
Standard Product70–79 pointsAdequate performance meeting baseline requirements
Reassessment RequiredBelow 70 pointsSignificant improvements needed before certification

6. Validity & Renewal

7. Fee Schedule

Standard Fees:

Service Fee Structure
Initial Evaluation€1,500 (all tiers)
Platinum Award€7,500
Gold Award€4,500
Standard Award€1,500

CSI Gold Member Benefits:

8. Certification Benefits

Certified products receive:

9. Governance & Oversight

This policy is:

10. Contact Information

For questions regarding the CSI Product Endorsement Policy:


Annex II: Vendor Self-Assessment Worksheet

Product Overview

Field Vendor Input
Product Name
Vendor/Company Name
Product Type(e.g., platform, module, appliance)
Deployment Model(e.g., cloud, hybrid, on-premise)
Primary Domains Covered(Select from CSI's 22 domains)
Target Market(e.g., enterprise, critical infrastructure)
Current Clients(if applicable)

CSI Scoring Dimensions Self-Assessment

Rate your product from 1 (low) to 5 (high) in each category:

Dimension Score (1–5) Notes / Evidence
InteroperabilitySupported integrations (SIEM, PSIM, IAM, etc.)
Compliance ReadinessEN/ISO/EU alignment, certifications
Deployment MaturityField-tested, scalable, modular
User ExperienceInterface design, accessibility, multilingual support
Innovation & IntelligenceAI/ML, threat intelligence, automation
Subtotal Score:____ / 25

Domain Capability Mapping

Rate each domain from 0 (not covered) to 5 (fully integrated):

Domain Score (0–5) Notes / Features Implemented
Strategic Governance
Technical Architecture
Operational Capability
Credentialing & Assurance
Zero Trust Architecture
Identity & Access Management
Strategy & Risk Management
Leadership & Governance
IT Platforms & Infrastructure
Physical Security
Vendor Management
Legal & Compliance
Human Resources
Education & Training
Operations & Resilience
Audit & Assurance
Systems Integration
Cross-Functional Collaboration
Intelligence (OSINT/HUMINT)
Cybersecurity
Digital Resilience
Insider Risk
Subtotal Score:____ / 110

Submission Readiness Checklist

Checklist Item Status (✓/✗)
Product profile completed
Technical documentation prepared
Compliance mapping attached
Pilot deployment site identified
Stakeholder feedback plan prepared
Fee structure reviewed

Vendor Declaration

I confirm that the information provided in this worksheet is accurate and reflects the current capabilities of our product. We understand that CSI endorsement is contingent upon successful credentialing, scoring, and proof of concept deployment.

Authorized Representative Name: ___________________

Title: ___________________

Date: ___________________

Signature: ___________________